Bonnie Bucqueroux teaches at Michigan State University's School of Journalism. A National Magazine Award winner, Bucqueroux built her first website in 1996. She is credited with having the first campaign blog of any candidate running for federal office when she ran for Congress as the Green Party candidate for District 8 in 2000. She and Susan Masten were also recently named co-presidents of Lansing Area NOW.

2 responses to “Decoding GOP rhetoric about “shrinking the size of government””

  1. Penn and Teller are really idiots, though. I know people find Luntz’s work morally reprehensible, but he’s totally up front about what he does, which I find kind of refreshing. It’s not as if what he does (i.e. spin) is done only by him. Other people just portray what they’re doing as “Truth,” while Luntz demonstrates how practically everything is “situated” and depends on perspective.

    As for privatization…I don’t like either option (gov vs private). I think both institutions have a way of undermining community cohesiveness, the lack of which, I’m convinced, is at the heart of the acrimony we see in the US today. I don’t have an alternative, but it might be nice if we had as a goal something broader and more dependent on overall well-being, rather than tied solely to economic efficiency.

  2. I had a sudden moment of clarity a few years back in discussing fundamentalist religion with a math colleague from Iran. He is passionate but sensible, broadly educated and logical. We were commiserating about inane conversations with fundamentalist nutters and he said, “I always interrupt the discussion at the beginning to ask matter-of-factly, can you please define what you mean by ‘god.’” This brings everything into focus, if you think about it.

    I am recently coming to the understanding that asking people (anyone-not just nutters), “can you please define what you mean by ‘government,’” has a similar clarifying effect. Giving a detailed answer to this question has become more and more difficult. From a traditional point of view, more weird things are *not* government and also more weird things *are* government. To make matters more difficult, the mention of the word now causes a dysfunctional foaming at the mouth among many. Your essay brings us down to a basic irreducible concept: money goes in, money goes out, shit gets done (maybe). Who pays? Who receives? How much? Who gets shit done? “The pocket of your middle-class neighbor” versus “the pocket of the CEO who lives in the walled community where the guard will taze you if you try to enter” is a clear demonstration of this clarity.

    The Penn and Teller bit is hilarious.

Leave a Reply